Green Tories back outcome-based environmental regulation and nature-based solutions
The Conservative Environment Network (CEN) last week published Taking root – a Conservative plan for the environment. “Overhauling regulation of the water sector” featured as number five in the ten point plan.
The CEN said of water regulation: “In the next parliament, the government should reform legacy EU water regulation to drive stronger economic growth and more innovation, while responding to the public concern about water quality and biodiversity loss.
“Current water regulation is overly prescriptive and output-based, with companies required to develop a vast array of different plans and strategies for the water environment. We should move to a more outcome-based approach to water regulation. New targets and plans to reduce different pollutants and governance based on river catchments would increase flexibility, tailor solutions to local priorities, rationalise regulations, reduce the costs of compliance, and encourage innovation, while ensuring the full range of pollutants is reduced. This comprehensive approach will become essential as other, new sources of pollution continue to be uncovered, such as the growing concern and recognition of the threat posed by so–called “forever chemicals” and microplastics.
“New water regulation should specifically encourage private funding for nature-based solutions, such as wetland creation, river re-wiggling, and regenerative farming, which enhance wildlife as well as improving water quality. Ministers should ensure regulators have clear guidance that encourages them to authorise nature-based solutions to meet the new outcome-based regulatory requirements.”
The CEN said its ten-point plan “sets out an ambitious, yet practical approach to net zero and nature restoration that brings people with us and enhances their quality of life. It puts forward evidence-based policies based on harnessing market forces, growing our economy, strengthening local communities, and respecting individual choice.”
Comments