This website includes excerpts from the latest edition of THE WATER REPORT.
Full coverage is available only in the print and digital editions of the magazine.
Within five days this December, companies will know their fate on prices and public ownership.
Buckle up for mid December, when two pivotal decisions for the water industry’s future will come within the space of five days.
The result of the general election on 12 December will either press the button on, or put to bed, the threat of re-nationalisation that has been hanging over the sector for the past 18 months.
We may see more clarity from Labour in advance of that, if its manifesto sets out the exact tune to which it plans to compensate shareholders for their water company equity. At the time of writing, there had been
Resourcing multiple referrals is clearly something the CMA has given some
thought to already, which suggests that more than a typical number of water appeals wouldn’t altogether come as a surprise.
nothing new, except the possibility of broadband being added to the list of public ownership targets. Meanwhile, advocates of the private model, including the CBI and Water UK, had a final flourish at demonstrating why, in their view, re-nationalisation would be costly and damaging
It ain't broke
A review of the changes needed in utility regulation by the NIC warns: “We can’t afford to get this one wrong.” But exactly who can’t get it wrong?
Summer 2009, and one of the UK economic regulators had concluded that the market it regulated: “Had delivered secure supplies for some 20 years. But there have been changes in recent years, some of them quite profound, with still more testing challenges to come.” The testing challenges included an 80% reduction in carbon emissions by 2050. And it pledged that it would be “guided by consumers’ interests and all other aspects of sustainable development.”
That regulator was Ofgem during its Project Discovery that morphed ultimately into its Revenue = Incentives + Innovation + Outputs (RIIO) regime for network regulation.
Skip forward a decade and this month the National Infrastructure Commission (NIC), having looked at the three economic regulators – Ofwat, Ofgem and Ofcom – has this to say in its report of its findings: “The current system has yielded unprecedented and much-needed investment in the utilities we all rely on, with improved outcomes for the public in recent years. But it was designed for different times.”
OK, so we’ve been here before. But does it tell us any more than plus ca change about regulation and policy?
From resources to resilience
Water Resources South East kicks of work on a multi-sector regional resilience plan.
“Urgent, serious and complicated” was how Water Resources South East's (WRSE's) independent chair, Simon Cocks, described work to create a multi-sector regional resilience plan for the South East. WRSE has been coordinating water resource planning across the region for over two decades. That’s been challenge enough, but things have just got a lot more complicated. The changes have been driven by climatic and growth challenges and facilitated by increasingly supportive policy, including the National Framework which will coordinate the work of the five regional water groups.
Chairing the launch event for the plan, Energy & Utility Skills chief executive Nick Ellins highlighted the sense of “talking to people in peace not war”. He was recalling the “numbing” scale of the 2012 drought, and the “absolute beating” the sector took from the media. Cocks added that with the scale of the challenge now laid out for all to see by the National Infrastructure Commission, the drive towards regional planning had progressed quickly and with conviction.
There still seems to be a hierarchy between the needs of consumers and
and the economy, and looking after the environment.”
A river runs through it
Critics say leakage, combined sewer overflows, pollution and excessive abstraction are linked and symptomatic of an uncaring industry. Ian Barker says this will put the breaks on calls to reduce personal consumption.
A few years ago, a water company chief executive said to me “Running a water company would be easy if it weren’t for the customers”. Thankfully that attitude is now history, and all companies work hard to put customer service at the heart of their operations.
But just because a company scores well on dealing with queries and complaints misses an important point: some of their customers will still be highly critical because of concerns relating to their wider interests. Whether it’s angling, wild swimming, ornithology, or angst about pollution, customers who are otherwise happy become ferocious critics on social media and elsewhere when they become aware of an issue that affects them. They see that in the past 20 years there has been little discernible improvement in four key areas of companies’ operations.
will keep you on top of the threats and opportunities emerging from retail and upstream competition.
It's the eye on the competition.
Pleasure doing business with you?
MOSL is seeking up to a 10% budget increase in its 2020-21 business plan, to make it and the market easier to do business with.
MOSL put a very different foot forward at its 2019 CEO Forum, convened on 8 November to discuss its 2020-21 business plan. Unlike the closed meetings of previous years, MOSL under the leadership of chief executive Sarah McMath, had invited interested parties beyond members. It stressed the need for honesty, transparency and inclusivity given the diversity of MOSL members, and – refreshingly – brought the voice of the end customer strongly
into the room (literally, through a series of videos with customers who had been asked to share their market experiences and views).
MOSL was seeking input from wholesale and retail leaders ahead of its formal business plan consultation on 22 November and a final 2020-21 business plan on 17 January 2020, for voting on 31 January.
McMath shared that she had already had positive feedback on the developing plan from the MOSL board, Panel and Ofwat’s senior team, and the Forum was an opportunity for trading parties to have their say.
Top performers hold their lead
MOSL reported overall improvement in how well wholesalers and, separately, retailers are performing against their obligations in the business retail market this month when it published league tables updated for the first six months of this financial year (April - October 2019).
Companies in the top spots retained their leads, though there was more movement at the bottom as some full year 2018/19 poor performers pulled themselves into the middle of the pack.
MOSL reported trading party performance against the Market Performance Standards and the Operational Performance Standards
There was little change at the top but jostling away from the bottom in MOSL's updated league tables.
These were published for the first time in May 2019 and have just been updated following what MOSL described as “significant programmes of work aimed at cleansing data, improving business processes and investing in better ways of working, much of which has involved close joint working between retail and wholesale parties”. The rankings are not a direct indicator of customer experience – though are linked to it.